Another perpective of looking at the lamps in my room. Hehe.
I used the black & white effect, erm ... to effect.
A weird angle of looking at flowers.
But it looks way artistic. Well, at least that's what I think.
The Night Life
I wish the lights can be seen clearer.
But that's the best my camera phone can do. :(
Amidst The Forest
The car in the corner looks cute like that,
don't you think so?
8 comments:
glowin' in the dark: wow! i like this one! what izzit? what izzit? fluorescent lamp?
the night life: u may want to consider hiking up pg hill on a fine day to take a good shot of the city.
Glowin in the Dark:
Mysterious....
Back into tradition:
o_O"
Flower Power:
Guess camera phones aren't meant for close-ups
The Night Life:
This is exactly the kind of shot a camera phone should avoid.
Amidst The Forest:
White balance is a bit off on the red side. There is some degree of vignetting (typical of compact cameras).
Conclusion:
Not bad, considering your equipment and experiance. "Back into tradition" seems a bit pointless though...
kryptos> ooo.. actually it's a pic of my table lamp done in Solar mode which make it looks so cool! :)
well.. I'm kinda lazy to hike up pg hill leh. Haha.
suntzu> Thx! =) I dont have much experience, so I just go by my guts which seem to be doing a good job. Yayz!
Actually, I kinda like Flower Power but what a pity my camera cant do close-ups properly. Boohoo.
The proper word is solarize, not solar. It refers to a traditional photographic technique (film photographers edit their photos too!) by deliberately overexposing their pictures.
To sunlight no less! (hence the name).
Obviously, someone found a way to recreate the effect and put it in your camera
i think solarize is the adjective la.. while solar is the noun lo.
pretty cool ya?
and the history of it is kinda funny. =)
Its a transitive verb.
The noun would be solarization
oh ya, verb. not adjective.
got mixed up a bit.
but then grammar never was my strong point. Hehe.
Post a Comment